DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RECORDS
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE
701 Ss. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
VDOCKE } = 14
i } 7 i
IN Kec ra
om >) at WH oe» C e
names TE Or UAE eT { =
+ +
adn
aamt
CAL.
recomme!
Aiech
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your post service conduct, desire to upgrade your discharge, and
assertion that your disciplinary charges were motivated by racial
prejudice. Nevertheless, the Board founce that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the
seriousness of your repeated misconduct. Further, you were given
wate wae wnrogceqdure dl
all Opportunity LY Geicha your acLions, put waivea your procecuss-
rights. Finally, there igs no evidence in the record, and you
provided none, to support your assertion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider’ its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Si rel
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3458 14
The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion of suffering with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) which existed prior to service. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2657 14
A ‘three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of - your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. — Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR962 14
Regarding your assertion, the Board noted there is no evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support your assertion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval recora, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. occasions, were You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct {civil conviction). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5991 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7144 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5845 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR517 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NJP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7371 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...